In conjunction with amplitude-friendly simultaneous processing of time-lapse seismic data, we introduce a QC scheme that steers the processing towards optimal time-lapse repeatability. We compute NRMS errors between stacked traces for different vintages of a survey after each main step of simultaneous processing. A processing step (which may include intermediate steps) is considered acceptable only when its overall NRMS error value is at most equal to its value from the previous processing step. We demonstrate this QC scheme with a well-designed time-lapse dataset.
Editors' Picks
- Science Break: Heart Attacks – “From the Archives”
Oliver Kuhn - The New Reservoir Characterization
John Pendrel - AVO Modeling in Seismic Processing and Interpretation Part 1. Fundamentals
Yongyi Li, Jonathan Downton, and Yong Xu - Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters: "λp", "µp", and "λ/µ fluid stack": from P and S inversions
Bill Goodway, T. Chen and J. Downton - The wedge model revisited
Joanna Cooper, Don Lawton and Gary Margrave - Seismic Attributes – a promising aid for geologic prediction
Satinder Chopra and Kurt Marfurt - Scanning Calgary's Water Towers: Applications of Hydrogeophysics in Challenging Mountain Terrain
Craig Christensen et al. - AVO analysis in the presence of NMO stretch and offset dependent tuning
Jonathan Downton
Errors and Omissions
A large volume of data is being converted to make this online archive. If you notice any problems with an article (examples: incorrect or missing figures, issue with rendering of formulas etc.) please let us know by emailing: admin@csegrecorder.com
Join the Conversation
Interested in starting, or contributing to a conversation about an article or issue of the RECORDER? Join our CSEG LinkedIn Group.
Share This Article